Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Spiegel v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 28, 2012

SPIEGEL
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable James V. Selna

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Karla J. Tunis Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action to the Superior Court of the State of California

The Court has made a review of the jurisdictional allegations in the Notice of Removal filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al. (collectively "defendants") on June 18, 2012.

The Notice predicates removal on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Notice, p. 1.) However, as recently held in Gary Leland Greenlee v. Wells Fargo, Case No. ED CV 12-789 JVS (DTBx) (Docket No. 14), the Court has determined that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is a citizen of both South Dakota and California as its principal place of business. The dual status of Well Fargo Bank, N.A. destroys diversity.

The case is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for lack of jurisdiction.

Initials of Preparer kjt

20120628

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.