Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jesse Lee Brown

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 28, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JESSE LEE BROWN,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Date: August 10, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, WILLIAM WONG, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, JESSE LEE BROWN, that the Status Conference date of June 29, 2012, be vacated and reset for August 10, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel requires additional time to review discovery, discuss the case with the government and pursue investigation.

It is further stipulated and agreed to between the parties that the time from the date of the signing of this order to and including August 10, 2012, should be excluded within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

Dated: June 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender /s/ Dennis S. Waks DENNIS S. WAKS Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JESSE LEE BROWN BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Dated: June 28, 2012 /s/ Dennis S. Waks for WILLIAM WONG Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through August 10, 2012.

20120628

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.