UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
July 2, 2012
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
For the Northern District of California Defendant should file an Amended Answer as soon as possible. The court will e-file the correct 20 Complaint. In light of the pending hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 21 scheduled for July 5, 2012, Defendant shall inform the court by Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 12:00 p.m. 22 if it needs to file an Amended Answer and when it will be filed. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BERKELEY, TATES TATES TATES
Due to a clerk's office error, the copy of Plaintiff's Complaint that is posted on the court's Electronic Case File is missing four pages of the Complaint hard-filed with this court and served on 18 the Defendant. If Defendant's Answer does not address all of the Complaint's allegations,
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.