(Super. Ct. No. CRF093149)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Raye , P. J.
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).*fn1 Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment.
We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On December 20, 2009, defendant's mother contacted law enforcement after discovering her Sam's Club Discover card was missing from her purse. When she called the credit card company to report her card missing, she was advised a hold had been placed on the card after a $494 purchase had been attempted at Wal-Mart. A subsequent $100 purchase had also been attempted, and two additional fraudulent purchases had been made earlier that month. The total amount in fraudulent purchases was $1,502.63.
On December 22, 2010, a parole agent was at defendant's mother's residence, where defendant lived. The parole agent found the stolen credit card in defendant's pants pocket, along with Wal-Mart receipts dated the days of the fraudulent purchases. Defendant admitted he had taken the card but claimed he used it only to gain access into Sam's Club, where he used cash to buy a Christmas gift, a set of Christmas ornaments, for his mother. He claimed a friend had taken the card from him and made the fraudulent purchases. No Christmas ornaments were found in defendant's mother's residence. DVD's matching those on the Wal-Mart receipts for the fraudulent purchases were found in defendant's room. Wal-Mart surveillance photos identified defendant as the individual using the stolen credit card. Defendant's mother believed defendant was purchasing merchandise to trade for methamphetamine to support his addiction.
Defendant was charged with fraudulent use of an access card with a prior theft conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 484g, 666),*fn2 second degree burglary (§ 459), and possession of stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)). Defendant pleaded no contest to fraudulent use of an access card with a prior theft conviction, and the remaining counts were dismissed with a Harvey waiver.*fn3 It was also agreed that defendant would not be initially sent to state prison but, instead, be placed on probation and ordered to serve a year in county jail, with the additional proviso that he could be released early from county jail to enter into a residential drug treatment program with the probation department's approval.
On March 12, 2010, the trial court placed defendant on three years' formal probation, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, and ordered him into drug treatment. Defendant was also ordered to serve one year in county jail and was given credit for 144 days for time served. The custody credits were subsequently corrected to reflect a total of 120 days. On April 7, 2010, defendant withdrew his request for drug court.
On September 14, 2010, the probation officer filed a declaration stating defendant had violated his probation by (1) testing positive for methamphetamine, (2) failing to attend substance abuse counseling, (3) failing to contact the probation officer as directed, and (4) failing to report to the probation officer as directed. The trial court issued an order revoking defendant's probation.
On October 1, 2010, defendant admitted he violated probation by submitting a urine sample that tested positive for methamphetamine. Probation was reinstated on the condition that he enroll in, attend, and complete a six-month residential treatment program in San Francisco with the Salvation Army.
On November 13, 2010, defendant was discharged from the Salvation Army residential treatment program for theft and leaving the program without permission, after he and another individual used an ATM card that did not belong to either of them and did not return to the program until the following day. Defendant did not report his discharge from the program to his probation officer until November 17, 2010. Defendant was thereafter accepted into the Jordan's Crossing Ministries rehabilitation program for a one-year commitment. However, on March 28, 2011, defendant was discharged from ...