Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mario Sanchez v. M. Knowles

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 2, 2012

MARIO SANCHEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
M. KNOWLES, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On December 26, 2006, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus together with a motion to stay the proceedings and hold his petition in abeyance pending the exhaustion of five claims petitioner wishes to add to the petition. On October 22, 2007, petitioner filed an amended petition which stated that "petitioner is currently in the process of drafting a habeas corpus petition to file in the California Court of Appeal." Dckt. No. 16 at 3. On February 11, 2008, the court granted petitioner a stay to allow him to exhaust his state remedies and directed petitioner to notify the court once he had exhausted his state remedies. Dckt. No. 17.

On September 28, 2011, because petitioner had not filed anything with the court relating to the status of his state court proceedings, the undersigned order petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dckt. No. 19. In his response to the order to show cause, petitioner claims "that the state court has not yet made a ruling regarding the dispositive claims, and that the pending state matter could vitiate the relief for federal habeas corpus . . . ." Dckt. No. 22 at 2. In support of this statement, petitioner submitted an order issued by the Sacramento Superior Court on January 12, 2011, which addresses a letter petitioner submitted to the Superior Court complaining about his post-conviction trial counsel. Id. at 6-7.

Based on petitioner's statement, the court will continue to hold his federal petition in abeyance to provide petitioner more time to exhaust his state remedies.*fn1 However, the court will order petitioner to submit quarterly status reports describing the progress of his state court proceedings. Petitioner shall attach to the status reports copies of the cover page of any document he files with or received from the state courts.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The September 28, 2011 order to show cause, Dckt. No. 19, is discharged; and

2. Petitioner shall file quarterly reports describing the progress of his state court proceedings and attach copies of the cover page of any document he files with or received from the state courts relating to the claims he seeks to exhaust, commencing thirty (30) days from the date of this order and continuing every ninety (90) days thereafter until his state court proceedings are terminated.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.