Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel K. Chestang v. Swarthout

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 2, 2012

DANIEL K. CHESTANG, PETITIONER,
v.
SWARTHOUT, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case is before the undersigned pursuant to petitioner's consent. Doc. 4. On April 23, 2012, the petition was dismissed with leave to amend within 28 days, as the petition failed to set forth a cognizable claim. However, that time limit has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated with the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the April 23, 2012, order and for failure to follow court instructions to file an amended petition. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20120702

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.