Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James Gross v. Symantec Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


July 5, 2012

JAMES GROSS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Charles R. Breyer Judge United States District Judge

Sean P. Reis (SBN 184004) sreis@edelson.com 2 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 3 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 4 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff James Gross and the Putative Class 6 KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 MAURA L. REES, State Bar No. 191698 7 ANTHONY J WEIBELL, State Bar No. 238850 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 8 Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road 9 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 10 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 E-mail: mrees@wsgr.com; aweibell@wsgr.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant Symantec Corporation 12 [Additional counsel included in signature block.] 13 14

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TO AUGUST 3, 2012 THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference ("CMC") and a hearing on Symantec's 2 motion to dismiss were previously set by the Court for July 6, 2012;

WHEREAS, the Court recently issued a notice resetting these events to July 20, 2012;

WHEREAS, counsel for Symantec will on that date be engaged in a series of previously- 5 scheduled depositions in another matter taking place on the East Coast, and counsel for Symantec 6 scheduled these depositions during the third and fourth weeks of July in material part to avoid any 7 conflict with the previously-set CMC and hearing in this action; 8

WHEREAS, Symantec requested that Plaintiff agree to a two-week continuance of the CMC and hearing to August 3, 2012, and Plaintiff has so agreed; 10

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

The CMC and hearing currently set for July 20, 2012 should be continued to August 3, 2012. 13 14

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the July 20, 2012 Case Management Conference and hearing on motion to dismiss are hereby reset to August 3, 2012. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED

Charles R. Breyer

20120705

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.