Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Frcp Michael L. Dalton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 5, 2012

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRCP MICHAEL L. DALTON, HAROLD HAND,
KATHLEEN M. VERNER, PATRICIA A. HATTON, MAXWELL M. FREEMAN, YOSHIKAZU MATAGA, GEORGE M. SCHOFIELD, RICK SIMAS, GARY A. STEWART, RUSSELL MUNSON, STEVEN KIKUCHI, STEVE ROSSO, JUSTIN GARNER, LAURA MAFFEI, LINDA OGATO AND THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR PACIFIC STATE BANK, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge

AARON K. McCLELLAN Ca. State Bar No. 197185 THOMAS P. MAZZUCCO Ca. State Bar No. 139758 HARLAN B. WATKINS Ca. State Bar. No. 176458 MURPHY PEARSON BRADLEY & FEENEY, P.C. 88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 788-1900 Facsimile: (415) 393-8087 Email: amcclellan@mpbf.com tmazzucco@mpbf.com hwatkins@mpbf.com ANDREW M. REIDY CATHERINE J. SERAFIN JEFFREY L. SCHULMAN (pro hac applications to be submitted) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Email: reidya@dicksteinshapiro.com serafinc@dicksteinshapiro.com schulmanj@dicksteinshapiro.com Attorneys for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Pacific State Bank

Assigned to the Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE; ORDER

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT:

1. WHEREAS, per the Court's Order Requiring Joint Status Report [Dkt 6], and subsequent Order based on the parties' stipulation [Dkt 27], the parties are currently required to hold a Rule 26(f) Conference by June 29, 2012;

2. WHEREAS, all of the Defendants have filed motions to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to stay this action, and/or joinders to the motions to dismiss or stay, which are currently scheduled for hearing before this Court on September 6, 2012;

3. WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the current deadline to conduct the Rule 26(f) Conference, until such time as all Defendants' currently pending Motions to Dismiss or Stay this action are heard and the Court issues its rulings upon the pending Motions,

THEREFORE, contingent upon the Court's permission, the Parties have stipulated that:

The Parties shall have until thirty (30) days following the Court's rulings upon the Defendants' pending Motions to Dismiss or Stay to conduct the Rule 26(f) Conference required by the Court's Order Requiring Joint Status Report.

So Stipulated.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120705

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.