Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Af Holdings LLC v. John Doe

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION


July 6, 2012

AF HOLDINGS LLC,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN DOE,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING ) PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE ) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

The Court has reviewed the Complaint with attached Exhibits, Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and all the papers filed in connection with the motion, and relevant case law. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Discovery is GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may immediately serve Rule 45 subpoena(s) to identify John Doe associated with Internet Protocol ("IP") address listed in the Complaint, limited to the following categories of entities and information:

From Internet Service Provider (ISP) identified in Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and any other entity identified as a provider of Internet services to John Doe in response to a subpoena or as a result of ongoing 2 BitTorrent activity monitoring: information sufficient to identify John Doe associated 3 with IP address listed in the Complaint, including name, current (and permanent) 4 address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address; it is 5 further

ORDERED any information disclosed to the Plaintiff in response to a Rule 45 subpoena may 7 be used by the Plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiff's rights as set forth in its 8 Complaint; it is further 9

ORDERED that Plaintiff and any entity which receives a subpoena shall confer, if necessary, with respect to the issue of payment for the information requested in the subpoena or for resolution of IP addresses which are not controlled by such entity, duplicate IP addresses that resolve to the same individual, other IP addresses that do not provide the name and other information requested of a unique individual, or for the entity's internal costs to notify its customers; it is further

ORDERED that any entity which receives a subpoena and elects to charge for the costs of production shall provide a billing summary and any cost reports that serve as a basis for such billing summary and any costs claimed by such entity; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order along with any subpoenas issued pursuant to this Order; it is further

ORDERED that the ISP, in turn, shall serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this order upon its relevant subscriber within 30 days from the date of service upon it. The ISP may serve the subscriber using any reasonable means, including written notice sent to the subscriber's last known address, transmitted either by first-class mail or via overnight service, or by e-mail notice; the subscriber and the ISP shall each have 30 days from the respective dates of service upon them to file any motions contesting the subpoena (including a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). If that period elapses without the filing of a contesting motion, the ISP shall have ten (10) days thereafter to produce the information responsive to the subpoena to plaintiff;

Finally, it is ORDERED that the subpoenaed entity shall preserve any subpoenaed 2 information pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash. 3 4 5 6 7 8

20120706

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.