Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zhixun Samuel Sun v. Rickenbacker Collections

July 10, 2012

ZHIXUN SAMUEL SUN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RICKENBACKER COLLECTIONS,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward J. Davila United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (Re: Docket No. 58)

Pending before the court is Plaintiff Zhixun Samuel Sun's ("Sun") motion for entry of 18 default. For the reasons discussed below, the court orders the Clerk of the Court to enter default as 19 to Defendant Rickenbacker Collections ("Rickenbacker"). 20

I.BACKGROUND

Sun filed his initial complaint alleging negligence and an intentional tort on October 20, 2009 in Santa Clara County Superior Court. On January 8, 2010, Rickenbacker filed its Answer to 23 the initial complaint. See Docket No. 1 Ex. C. On March 11, 2010, Rickenbacker removed the 24 action to this court. On November 15, 2010, Sun filed the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") 25 alleging two causes of action: (1) violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") 26 and (2) violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. On December 7, 2010, Rickenbacker filed a 27 motion to dismiss the FDCPA claim. On February 18, 2011, Judge Lucy Koh granted the motion to dismiss the FDCPA claim and noted that because the motion did not address the Fair Credit 2 Reporting Act claim, the Fair Credit Reporting Act claim survived. 3

On March 3, 2011, counsel for Rickenbacker filed a motion to withdraw as attorney. On April 8, 2011, Judge Koh granted the motion to withdraw and ordered Rickenbacker to "retain new 5 counsel within 30 days of this the date of [the] Order. If new defense counsel does not enter an 6 appearance within 30 days, Defendant will be in default and may face entry of default judgment." 7

Docket No. 40 at 4:13-15. New counsel for Rickenbacker has not appeared. 8

On April 25, 2011, the action was reassigned to the undersigned. On May 24, 2011, Sun 4 9 filed a motion for entry of default and a motion for default judgment. The motions were brought 10 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1), which require the clerk to enter default in 11 particular circumstances. Thus, on November 2, 2011, the motion was referred to the Clerk of the Court. See. Docket No. 50. On November 29, 2011, the Clerk declined to enter default. On 13 December 13, 2011, Sun filed a second motion for entry of default. On December 22, 2011, the 14 Clerk again declined to enter default. 15

On February 28, 2012, Sun filed the third motion for entry of default, which is currently 16 before the court. 17

II.LEGAL STANDARD

A.Entry of Default

"When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead 20 or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the 21 party's default." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Before a default will be entered, the court clerk must be 22 satisfied from plaintiff's request and accompanying documentation that (1) defendant has been 23 served with the summons (or has agreed to waive service); (2) the time allowed by law for 24 responding has expired; (3) defendant has failed to file a pleading or motion permitted by law; and 25 (4) defendant is neither a minor nor an incompetent person. Bibbs v. Tilton, No. No. 1:11--cv-- 26 01012--GSA--PC, 2011 WL 6130901, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2011). 27 28

B.Time to File Responsive Pleading

"A defendant must serve an answer within 21 days after being served with the summons 3 and complaint" Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). If an amended complaint is filed, an answer "must be 4 made within the time remaining to respond to the original pleading or within 14 days after service 5 of the amended pleading, whichever is later." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 12(a)(4)(A), if a defendant files a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and "the court denies the motion 7 or postpones its disposition until trial, the responsive pleading must be served within 14 days after 8 notice of the court's action." The majority of courts have held that Rule 12(a)(4)(A) also applies in 9 circumstances where, as here, the defendant files a motion to dismiss that is only partially 10 dispositive. See Talbot v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd., No. 2:11--cv--01766--KJD--CWH, 2012 WL 11 1068763, at *4 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.