Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Treasury Bank, N.A v. Carla Smith

July 10, 2012

TREASURY BANK, N.A., PLAINTIFF,
v.
CARLA SMITH, ELEANOR SMITH, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. No. 7]

Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Because Defendants have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion.

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion.

C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

The hearing on Plaintiff's motion was set for July 9, 2012. Defendants' opposition was therefore due by June 18, 2012. As of

the date of this Order, Defendants have not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Defendants' failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to remand, and GRANTS the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120710

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.