Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dennis Hellervik et al. v. 3m Company et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 10, 2012

DENNIS HELLERVIK ET AL.
v.
3M COMPANY ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge

JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Sharon L. Williams Not Reported N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Dismissing Remaining Defendants

On June 26, 2012, the Court granted Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Because the Court found that the allegations in the FAC were substantially similar as to all Defendants, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the dismissal order should not be applied to the remaining Defendants.

Plaintiffs timely responded to the Order to Show Cause on July 9, 2012. Plaintiffs do not argue that it would be inappropriate to apply the June 26 Order to the remaining Defendants. Instead, they ask for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Court denies that request dismisses the remaining Defendants. Plaintiffs have already had two chances to state sufficient factual allegations to support their claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer

20120710

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.