Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bruce Patrick Haney v. L. Eptstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 11, 2012

BRUCE PATRICK HANEY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
L. EPTSTEIN, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL INITIAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS MOOT (Doc. 31)

Plaintiff Bruce Patrick Haney is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action for violation of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action for damages is proceeding on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Epstein and Gonzales.

On May 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to compel Defendants to respond to his interrogatories, request for admissions, and request for production of documents, which he served on March 21, 2012. On May 22, 2012, Defendants filed an opposition to the motion, arguing that it should be denied as moot because they served their discovery responses on May 16, 2012. Plaintiff did not file a reply.

In as much as Plaintiff's motion sought to compel initial responses which were served on May 16, 2012, Plaintiff's motion is HEREBY ORDERED DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120711

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.