The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Date: July 20, 2012 Time: 1:30 p.m. Dept.: 11, 19th Floor
Plaintiffs hereby submit their Case Management Conference Statement as follows:
1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed on June 16, 2011 (Dkt. #1) 18 to compel Defendant's compliance with its collective bargaining agreement. Service on Defendant 19 was effectuated on June 29, 2012. A Proof of Service of Summons was filed with the Court on 20 July 2, 2012 (Dkt. #10). Defendant's Answer is due on July 20, 2012.
2. The parties have been in contact to discuss settlement of this matter by way of a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation providing for a payment plan to allow Defendant to bring their 23 account current by making monthly payments to Plantiffs. Plaintiffs' counsel anticipates providing 24 a proposed Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation to Defendant this week. 25
3. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, 26 currently scheduled for July 20, 2012, be continued for 60 days to allow for additional settlement 27 efforts and/or for Defendant to file an Answer.
4. There are no issues that need to be addressed by the parties at the currently scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court's 3 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled Case Management Conference.
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.
Executed this 10th day of July, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION By: /S/ Blake E. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiffs
The currently set Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued to ______________________ at _______________. All related dead September 21, 2012 1:30 p.m. lines are hereby extended 16 accordingly. 17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...