The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mauro , J.
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
Appointed counsel for defendant Anthony Robert Wilson asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.
Defendant used a motor vehicle to evade law enforcement on June 6, 2011, driving with disregard for the safety of other people and property. That same day he was found in possession of methamphetamine.
Defendant was arrested and charged with theft of a vehicle with a prior conviction for stealing a vehicle (Pen. Code, § 666.5), evading an officer with disregard for public safety (Veh. Code, § 2800.2), possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), possession of a deadly weapon (former Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)), resisting a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)), possession of paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364), and possession of a syringe (former Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4140). It was further alleged that defendant served three prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).)
Defendant pleaded guilty to felony evading a peace officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2) and possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). Defendant also admitted serving a prior prison term. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).) In exchange for his plea, the remaining charges and allegations were dismissed, and the People agreed to a stipulated term of four years eight months in state prison.
The trial court sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement, ordered him to pay various fines and fees, and awarded 316 days of custody credit (158 actual and 158 conduct). Defendant appeals without a certificate of probable cause.
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed and we have received no communication from defendant.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a ...