Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Aaron Lewis Gaudinier

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 12, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
AARON LEWIS GAUDINIER,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant Aaron Lewis Gaudinier

AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON Date: August 20, 2012 Time: 1:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Sheila K. Oberto

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, BRIAN W. ENOS, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Aaron Lewis Gaudinier, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to August 20, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is July 16, 2012. The requested new date is August 20, 2012.

The defense is making arrangements to view the forensic evidence in the case and conduct additional witness interviews. Additional time is requested to complete these tasks prior to the next status conference. The government does not object to this defense request for a continuance.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Any future request to continue the status conference must be supported by a showing of good cause, which in turn, requires due diligence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120712

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.