Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jerald Clinton (J.C.) Eaglesmith v. Jeff Ray

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 12, 2012

JERALD CLINTON (J.C.) EAGLESMITH,
RAMONA EAGLESMITH, EILEEN COX, AND BRUCE BARNES,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JEFF RAY, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, SUE SEGURA, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PLUMAS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ PLUMAS COUNTY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. John A. Mendez U. S. District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PRODUCE INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINER TESTS AND TEST RESULTS TO PARTIES, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 35(b)(1) and (5)

Plaintiffs J.C. Eaglesmith, Eileen Cox and Bruce Barnes allege in their Complaint that defendants' conduct caused them emotional distress. Because they thereby placed their mental condition at issue, they agreed to submit to an independent medical examination by defendants' expert Dr. Matt Gould. In the course of examining each plaintiff, Dr. Gould conducted various psychological tests, and enlisted Dr. Bronson to analyze the results.

Plaintiffs have requested that defendants produce the tests and test results in order that plaintiffs can prepare cross examination of Dr. Gould and any other defendant expert that relies on those tests and test results. According to defendant's attorneys, Dr. Gould believes that the ethical rules of the American Psychiatric Association preclude him from sharing "the test and raw data results" with anyone other than a licensed clinical psychologist or psychiatrist.

On July 27, 2011, the parties entered a Stipulation for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 47). The Court signed the Order on July 29, 2011.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 35(b)(1) entitles the person examined to be provided with a copy of the medical examiner's written report and requires that the report include "in detail* * * the results of any tests." Rule35(b)(5) grants to the Court the authority to order on motion that the party deliver the report, as defined by Rule 35(b)(1), and "[i]f the report is not provided, the court may exclude the examiner's testimony at trial."

Therefore, plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate that the Court enter an Order that directs Dr. Matt Gould to produce the tests and test results to the parties' attorneys.

Dated: July 6, 2012 SIEGEL & YEE By: /s/Peter Haberfeld Peter Haberfeld Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: STUBBS & LEONE By: /s/ Brian Duus Brian Duus Attorneys for Defendants

SO ORDERED

John A. Mendez

20120712

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.