UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 13, 2012
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Gary Allen Feess
JS -- 6
LINKS: 11, 12
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: (In Chambers)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
On February 17, 2012, Plaintiff Safeco Insurance Company of America filed this claim against Defendant Lisa Nadalsky, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Daniel Nadalsky. (Docket No. 1, [Compl.].) Defendant's spouse was killed in a car accident while riding as a passenger in a car insured by Plaintiff, who seeks declaratory relief in connection with Defendant's claim for benefits under its insurance policy. (Id. ¶¶ 12, 17, 32.)
In the Complaint, Plaintiff invoked diversity jurisdiction, alleging that Defendant is "a resident of California." (Id. ¶¶ 1, 3.) Allegations of residence, however, are insufficient to establish citizenship for diversity jurisdiction. Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001). Therefore, on July 3, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Docket No. 11 [7/3/12 Order].) Plaintiff timely responded on July 9, 2012, but Plaintiff's response is deficient in that it still alleges the residency, not citizenship, of Defendant. (See Docket No. 12 [Response] ¶ 2.
As such, the Court cannot determine whether complete diversity exists between the parties to establish subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's claim is DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.