Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Title: Scot A. Blum v. Kpmg Llp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 17, 2012

TITLE: SCOT A. BLUM
v.
KPMG LLP, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Michelle Urie N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF A PRIOR PROCEEDING

The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause why the remainder of this action should not be stayed pending resolution of Sixty-Three Strategic Investment Funds v. United States,No. C 05-1123 JW, which is currently before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding the BLIPS transaction. Plaintiff shall file a response to this order on or before July 31, 2012. Defendants shall file any reply on or before August 7, 2012. The Court will thereafter take the matter under submission and will notify the parties if it believes a hearing is necessary.

20120717

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.