UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 17, 2012
ABBATE FAMILY FARMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
G D FRESH DISTRIBUTION, INC., AND ) GEORGE DZIAK, )) DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
On June 13, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants GD Fresh Distribution Inc. and George Dziak, as an individual, filed on February 29, 2012, be granted in part, and denied in part. (Doc. 18). These Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, no objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations issued on June 13, 2012, are ADOPTED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant G D FRESH DISTRIBUTION, INC., is GRANTED;
2. Judgment be entered in this action against Defendant G D FRESH DISTRIBUTION, INC. with damages awarded in an amount broken down as follows:
a. Plaintiff is awarded principal damages in the amount of $21,438.05;
b. Plaintiff is awarded pre-judgment interest through and including April 26, 2012 in the amount of $2,487.44 and pre-judgment interest to the date of judgment at the rate of $10.54 per day;
c. Post-judgment interest on the judgment is awarded at the rate of 10.54 per
d. Costs are awarded in the amount of $350.00.
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant GEORGE DZIAK, as an individual jointly and severally, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
4. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff may file a renewed motion for default judgment as to Defendant GEORGE DZIAK, as an individual. The motion should include sufficient declarations supporting Defendant GEORGE DZIAK's individual liability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.