Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jordan Wirtz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 18, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JORDAN WIRTZ, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE Date: August 3, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Jordan Wirtz, John R. Manning, Esq., that the status conference presently set for July 20, 2012, be continued to August 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.

Further, all of the parties, the United States of America and the defendant as stated above, hereby agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under Title 18, United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties stipulation, July 18, 2012, to and including August 3, 2012.

The defense requests more time to review and research proposed resolution proffered by the Government.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 18, 2012 /s/ John R. Manning JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Jordan Wirtz Dated: July 18, 2012 Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney by: /s/ Michael M. Beckwith MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, July 18, 2012, to and including August 3, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), and Local Codes T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that July 20, 2012, status conference shall be continued until August 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120718

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.