IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 18, 2012
CHARLES DAVID BERLINGHOFF, PLAINTIFF,
MAX RUFFCORN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff is an inmate at the Shasta County Jail and proceeding pro se with a general negligence action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 26, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations were returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times.*fn1 Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 26, 2012, are adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed as barred by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 46 (1971).