IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 19, 2012
ROBERT DALE BOERNER, PETITIONER,
KINGS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ROBERT DALE BOERNER, PETITIONER,
KINGS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed two nearly identical applications for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his conviction issued by the KingsCounty Superior Court. KingsCounty is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis filed in Case No. 2:12-cv-1868.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;
2. These actions are transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case numbers assigned and shall be filed at:
United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.