Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Todd Burton, On Behalf of Himself and All v. Time Warner Cable

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 20, 2012

TODD BURTON, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: June 1, 2012 Trial Date: None

2 similarly situated ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. ("Defendant") 3

(collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to 4 extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint. 5

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Todd Burton, on behalf of himself and all others

WHEREAS, on June 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a putative class action Complaint against

Defendant, alleging violations of the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551, et seq., 7 the California Consumer Records Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.80, et seq., and California Penal 8

WHEREAS, Defendant accepted service of the Complaint on June 5, 2012.

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, this Court entered an order granting the Parties' stipulation

11 to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint to July 26, 2012. 12

13 improper venue, and Plaintiff has agreed to take Defendant's argument under advisement. 14

15 and in the interest of conserving the Parties' resources and judicial economy, Plaintiff has agreed 16 to a further extension of Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint of one week to August 2, 17

WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for the purpose of unnecessary delay.

WHEREAS, the extension of time sought will not alter the date of any event or deadline

20 already fixed by Court order. 21

Code § 637.5, and breach of implied contract. 9

WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file a motion to dismiss based on, among other grounds,

WHEREAS, in order to give the Parties an opportunity to resolve this issue by agreement,

2012. 18

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint in this action shall be extended to August 2, 2012. 3

Dated: July 19, 2012 4 WHITE & CASE LLP 5 By: /s/ Bryan A. Merryman Bryan A. Merryman 6 Attorneys for Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. Dated: July 19, 2012 SIPRUT PC 8 By: /s/ Todd C. Atkins Todd C. Atkins Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Burton

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

DECLARATION OF BRYAN A. MERRYMAN

I, Bryan A. Merryman, am an attorney of record for Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc.

Todd C. Atkins, attorney of record for Plaintiff Todd Burton, gave me his concurrence in the 4 filing of the document titled "SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 5 DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT," which 6 concurrence shall serve in lieu of his signature on that filed document. I have obtained and will 7 maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered 8 or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action 9 (including appeal, if any). 10

Dated: July 19, 2012 WHITE & CASE LLP 11 12 13 By: /s/ Bryan A. Merryman Bryan A. Merryman Attorneys for Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc.

20120720

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.