The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: June 1, 2012 Trial Date: None
2 similarly situated ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. ("Defendant") 3
(collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to 4 extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint. 5
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Todd Burton, on behalf of himself and all others
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a putative class action Complaint against
Defendant, alleging violations of the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551, et seq., 7 the California Consumer Records Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.80, et seq., and California Penal 8
WHEREAS, Defendant accepted service of the Complaint on June 5, 2012.
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, this Court entered an order granting the Parties' stipulation
11 to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint to July 26, 2012. 12
13 improper venue, and Plaintiff has agreed to take Defendant's argument under advisement. 14
15 and in the interest of conserving the Parties' resources and judicial economy, Plaintiff has agreed 16 to a further extension of Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint of one week to August 2, 17
WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for the purpose of unnecessary delay.
WHEREAS, the extension of time sought will not alter the date of ...