UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
July 20, 2012
ELIZABETH BAHN, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, CLASS ACTION
YAKULT HONSHA CO., LTD.;
YAKULT S.A. DE C.V., AND YAKULT U.S.A. INC., CIV. L.R. 6-2 25 DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR FOR PLAINTIFF TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Elizabeth Bahn ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Yakult U.S.A. Inc. ("Defendant"), 2 by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff may have a 3 30 day extension of time through and including July 23, 2012 within to file her Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Strike, Plaintiff Elizabeth Bahn's 5 Complaint [D.E. 12] ("the Motion") or amend the complaint, and that if Plaintiff files an 6 Opposition to the Motion then Defendant may have an extension of time through and including 7 August 3, 2012 within which to file its Reply in support of the Motion. The Motion hearing date 8 and time remain unchanged -- September 27, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. The declarations required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) are attached hereto. 10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 20, 2012 BECK & LEE TRIAL LAWYERS 12 13 By: /s/ Jared H. Beck 14 Jared H. Beck 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 17 Dated: June 20, 2012 SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 18 By: /s/ Mark C. Dosker 19 Mark C. Dosker 20 Attorneys for Defendant YAKULT U.S.A. INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.