Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Matrix, Inc., A California Corporation v. Macy's Inc.

July 20, 2012

MATRIX, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MACY'S INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;
MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Paul L. Abrams United States Magistrate Judge

DISCOVERY MATTER [Referred to the Hon. Paul L. Abrams] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Complaint Filed: February 21, 2012 Trial Date: February 19, 2013

1. STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE:

This action involves claims for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act of 1976, Title 17 U.S.C., § 101 et seq. The Parties, who are variously manufacturers and vendors of textile designs and apparel retailers, are direct and/or indirect competitors of each other. A primary element of this case is related to plaintiff's claim that because of defendants' alleged wrongful acts, plaintiff has lost substantial business relating to its copyrighted designs. The Parties therefore recognize that extensive discovery requesting information from the Parties, their vendors, customers and clients, including financial information, market information and other commercially and competitively sensitive information may be necessary to prove and/or disprove plaintiff's claims and defendants' defenses thereto. There will also potentially be multiple depositions of the Parties' employees or agents and third party vendors, customers or clients and such persons will likely be asked to answer questions on these potentially sensitive subject areas. The Parties, as competitors in the industry, will likely be placed at a competitive or economic disadvantage if such confidential and/or proprietary information is disclosed to other Parties and/or the public at large. This Order is therefore necessary to avoid any prejudice or harm in the form of loss of competitive advantage which would likely result if such information was disclosed in the absence of the protections set forth herein. This Order is also necessary for the orderly management of this litigation. Without this Order, the exchange of Party information, as well as information needed from third parties, including most importantly the Parties' vendors, customers or clients may become logistically very difficult, time consuming and expensive. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential.

2. In connection with discovery and the trial of this action, the Parties may designate certain documents and testimony, or other information derived therefrom, as "Confidential" under the terms of this Order.

3. "Confidential" information is information which has not been made public and which concerns or relates to the Parties' business practices and falls within Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), including within the following categories: material protected under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, California Civil Code section 3426, et seq., in that such information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means, by other persons, who can obtain economic value from its disclosures or use; information that is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy; material that is regarded by a Party as being confidential, private, or proprietary in nature, customer lists, confidential financial information of the Parties (including but not limited to profit margins, sales data, profits, and retail sales information); vendor lists; order summaries; confidential contracts; proprietary fabric/style specifications; documents describing concepts, ideas, proposals, designs, inventions, devices, methods of manufacturing, techniques, development processes, marketing programs, and trade secrets; and customer-confidential information, agreements or relationships with non-parties designated as confidential between the parties to such agreements.

4. A party receiving ("Receiving Party") material protected under this agreement ("Protected Material") may use Protected Material disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation.

5. By designating a document, testimony or other information derived therefrom as Protected Material labeled "Confidential" under the terms of this Order, the Parties are certifying that there is a good faith basis both in law and in fact for the designation. Such "Confidential" materials shall be used solely in connection with this lawsuit, and not for any business, competitive, or governmental purpose or function, and such information shall not be disclosed to anyone except as provided herein.

6. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order should be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the party producing Protected Material ("Producing Party") affix the legend "Confidential" on each page that contains protected material, or prominently on each electronic media that contains protected material.

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings, testimony taken at a deposition may be designated as "Confidential" by making a statement to that effect on the record at the deposition or other proceeding. Following the deposition, the party wishing to designate certain testimony as Protected Material ("Designating Party") shall have 30 days, after the transcript becomes available, to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 30 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Order.

(c) for information produced in any other form, including any tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "Confidential." If only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions.

7. Information or material produced which is designated as "Confidential" may be disclosed or made available only to the Court, to counsel for a party (including the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed by such counsel), and to the "qualified persons" designated below:

a. in-house counsel of a party, or an officer, director, or employee of a party deemed necessary by counsel to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action;

b. experts or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained to assist in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action who sign an undertaking, in the form of Exhibit A hereto, confirming that they have ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.