IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo)
July 23, 2012
THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
NIKKI MARSHALL, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
(Super. Ct. No. 104239)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robie , J.
P. v. Marshall CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
On August 11, 2010, defendant entered a grocery store and used a fraudulent check to buy groceries.
Defendant Nikki Marshall pled no contest to second degree burglary in exchange for a stipulated midterm sentence of two years to be served in county jail and the dismissal of the remaining counts. The trial court sentenced defendant accordingly. Defendant appeals.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: HULL , Acting P. J. DUARTE , J.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.