The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable R. Gary Klausner United States District Judge
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
On or about June 24, 2011, Plaintiff United States of America ("the government," "the United States of America" or "plaintiff") filed a Complaint for Forfeiture alleging that the defendant $2,394,181.00 in U.S. Currency (the "defendant currency") is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
Claimant Vasile Babuschin ("claimant") filed a claim to the defendant currency on or about September 9, 2011 and an answer to the Complaint on or about December 20, 2011. No other parties have appeared in this case and the time for filing claims and answers has expired.
The government and claimant have now agreed to settle this action and to avoid further litigation by entering into this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture.
The Court, having been duly advised of and having considered the matter, and based upon the mutual consent of the parties hereto,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture.
2. The Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
3. Notice of this action has been given as required by law. No appearances have been made in the litigation by any person other than claimant. The Court deems that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the Complaint for Forfeiture to be true.
4. The sum of $8,000.00 only (without interest), less any debts or other amounts owed by claimant or his attorney of record in this case which the United States of America is entitled to offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716,*fn1 shall be returned to claimant. The remainder of the defendant currency (i.e., $2,386,181.00), plus the interest earned by the United States of America on the defendant currency shall be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds in accordance with law.
5. The funds to be returned to claimant pursuant to paragraph 4 above shall be paid to claimant by electronic transfer directly into the client trust account of Ronald Richards, Esq., attorney of record for claimant in this case. Claimant (through his attorney of record Ronald Richards, Esq.) shall provide all information and complete all documents requested by the United States of America in order for the United States of America to complete the transfer and determine the government's right to any offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716 including, without limitation, providing claimant's social security and taxpayer identification numbers (if any), claimant's attorney of record's taxpayer identification number, and the identity of the bank, the bank's address and the account name, account number, account type and wire transfer routing number for the Ronald Richards client trust account to which the transfer of funds is to be made.
6. Claimant hereby releases the United States of America, its agencies, agents, officers, employees and representatives, including, without limitation, all agents, officers, employees and representatives of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the United States Customs and Border Protection, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and their respective agencies, as well as all agents, officers, employees and representatives of any state or local governmental or law enforcement agency involved in the investigation or prosecution of this matter, from any and all claims, actions, or liabilities arising out of or related to this action, including, without limitation, any claim for attorney fees, costs, and interest, which may be asserted by or on behalf of claimant, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise.
7. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the defendant currency and institution of these proceedings. This judgment shall be construed as a certificate of ...