IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 24, 2012
RONALD DAVENPORT, PLAINTIFF,
BEN LEE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2012, defendant Sahota filed a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to the motion. On June 22, 2012 the court granted plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition and warned plaintiff that failure to do so could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition.
Plaintiff has been warned that he must file a response to defendant's motion. Plaintiff has disobeyed this court's orders and failed to prosecute this action.
Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.