IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 26, 2012
MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS PLAINTIFF,
A. GORBY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge
On June 12, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's June 6, 2012 order granting defendants $2,058.19 in costs and fees associated with their bringing a motion to compel plaintiff to be deposed which was granted. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 6, 2012, is affirmed.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.