Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Maria Gallarado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 27, 2012

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARIA GALLARADO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND

[Dkt. No. 8]

Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Because Defendant has not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion.

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

The hearing on PLaintiff's motion was set for July 30, 2012. Defendant's opposition was therefore due by July 9, 2012. As of the date of this Order, Defendant has not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Defendant's failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to remand, and GRANTS the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120727

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.