Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Herman D. Shead v. C/O Vang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 31, 2012

HERMAN D. SHEAD,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O VANG,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 64) FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Herman D. Shead, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 5, 2009. On January 5, 2012, the Court issued the second scheduling order, which required Plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or before July 9, 2012. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006). However, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute;

2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to file a pretrial statement pending further order; and

3. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120731

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.