UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 1, 2012
BRIAN FLETCHER, PLAINTIFF,
C/O J.R. OLMEDA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Superseding Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Superseding Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED as follows: That defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Claim 1 on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to state a claim under either the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments, and that this claim is hereby dismissed with leave to amend; defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Claim 2 on the ground that plaintiff has failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies, and that this claim is hereby dismissed without leave to amend; and that if plaintiff still desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a Third Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is admonished that, if he fails to timely file a Third Amended Complaint, the action will be subject to dismissal with prejudice on the grounds set forth in the Superseding Report & Recommendation and for failure to diligently prosecute.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.