Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Daniel Mcgrath

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 1, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL MCGRATH
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Garland E. Burrell

MARK J. REICHEL, State Bar #155034 455 THE CAPITOL OF MARK J. REICHEL Sacramento, California LAW OFFICES 3rd FLOOR, Suite 350 Telephone: (916) 498-925895814 FAX: mark@reichellaw.com MALL, (916) 441-6553 www.reichellaw.com DANIEL Attorney MCGRATH for Defendant

TRIAL CONFIRMATION SET DATES TRIAL, STIPULATION TO FOR HEARING AND CONFERENCE; STATUS ORDER THEREON

Status Conference

Date: September 28, 2012

Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, KYLE REARDON, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present date for the status hearing be re calendared for September 28, 2012.

It is further stipulated by the parties that a date for jury trial be selected as November 13, 2012; that a trial confirmation hearing be set for October 19, 2012.

The continuance of the status conference is requested as defense counsel needs adequate time to prepare for the case, and the defense is still reviewing the discovery and will be researching matters. As well, defense counsel will be in negotiations with the government in an effort to resolve the case.

Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation is lodged, through September 28, 2012, and through and to November 13, 2012, should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. .

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4. Further, the proceeding on each scheduled matter commences at 9:00 a.m.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Judge Senior United States District

20120801

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.