Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James Lynn Wride v. Fresno County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 1, 2012

JAMES LYNN WRIDE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRESNO COUNTY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION, AND REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO NOTIFY THE COURT IF THEY WOULD LIKE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (Docs. 113 and 129)

This is a civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12132-12133, and California law by Plaintiff James Lynn Wride. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's third amended complaint against Defendant County of Fresno, Burrows, Heggen, Kamlade, Snyder, and Sutakul for violating Plaintiff's rights under federal and state law while he was housed at the Fresno County Jail. On July 25, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation to modify the scheduling order filed on November 29, 2011. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).

Accordingly, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the scheduling order is HEREBY MODIFIED as follows: the non-expert discovery cut-off date remains August 24, 2012, with the exception of Defendant Heggen's deposition, which will be set on a subsequent date mutually agreeable to the parties; and all other dates remained unchanged.

If the parties would like a settlement conference scheduled prior to the filing of pretrial dispositive motions, they shall notify the Court as soon as practicable after the close of discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120801

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.