UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 3, 2012
K. GERSTEL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 86)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 80)
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff Ferdinand Reynolds ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 16, 2009. Doc. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the issuance of a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary injunction requiring an attorney to send Plaintiff legal stationary supplies. Doc. 80. On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which recommended denying Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and gave Plaintiff fifteen days to file any objections. Doc. 86. On April 20, 2012, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Doc. 89.
II. Conclusion and Order
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case and has reviewed Plaintiff's objections. The Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on April 10, 2012, is adopted in full (Doc. 86); and
2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, filed February 29, 2012, (Doc. 80), is DENIED, with prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.