Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Phoebe Juel, An Individual and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Apple Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 6, 2012

PHOEBE JUEL, AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
APPLE INC.,
DEFENDANT.
ROBERT HERSKOWITZ
v.
APPLE INC.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 Defendant Apple Inc. seeks an order, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, enlarging its time to 2 respond to the complaints in the following two related cases: 3 * Herskowitz v. Apple Inc., No. 5:12-cv-02131-LHK (N.D. Cal.) 4 * Juel v. Apple Inc., No. 5:12-cv-03124-LHK (N.D. Cal.) 5 Having considered all the papers filed by the parties in connection with Apple's Motion to 6 Enlarge Time to Respond, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple's Motions. Apple's response to the 7 complaints in the Herskowitz and Juel actions will be due 20 days after a consolidated complaint 8 is filed or 20 days after any denial of Apple's motion to consolidate these related cases.

Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120806

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.