Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thomas Richard Di Bartelo v. Alex Scott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION


August 6, 2012

THOMAS RICHARD DI BARTELO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALEX SCOTT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the complaint, the motion to dismiss, and all of the records and files herein and has conducted a de novo review of that portion of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to which objections were filed. The Court accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. All claims against the State of California are DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. All claims against Defendants Scott, Tompkins, Talbot and Valverde, in their official capacities, are DISMISSED with prejudice.

3. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Scott under 5 U.S.C. § 558(b) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for violation of his constitutional right to travel against Defendants Talbott and Valverde is DISMISSED with prejudice.

5. Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985(3) and 1986 are DISMISSED with prejudice, as Plaintiff has failed to file a first amended complaint within 21 days of the Report and Recommendation, as ordered by the magistrate judge.

20120806

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.