Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael Marlo v. United Parcel Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 7, 2012

MICHAEL MARLO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER RE: UNION-RELATED EVIDENCE

For the reasons set forth in Defendant's bench brief in support of its motions in limine, the court finds that Plaintiff's California Labor Code section 923 claim is preempted to the extent that it is based on Plaintiff's attempts to unionize workers.

The court therefore grants Defendant's request to exclude the following evidence:

(1) Plaintiff's efforts or inquiries related to unionizing full time supervisors;

(2) any conversations Plaintiff had related to unionizing full time supervisors, including his manager's alleged response;

(3) any witness's speculation or impressions as to whether having Defendant's supervisors unionized would be consistent with its culture; and

(4) any other testimony related to unionizing any of Defendant's workforce.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120807

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.