Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tony Asberry v. Matthew Cate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 10, 2012

TONY ASBERRY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's July 23, 2012 request for permission to file a motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 57), which the court construes as a motion for entry of default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). In this motion, plaintiff alleges that defendants have not filed a timely response to his third amended complaint.

On July 23, 2012, defendants Virga, Phelps, McCarvel, Bobbala, Nangalama, Wedell and Ali were granted thirty days to file a response to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and state law claims contained in the third amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 55.) In the July 23, 2012 order, the court also ordered service of defendants Elton, Dhillon, Duc and Chin. (Id.) Thirty days have not passed since July 23, 2012, and defendants Elton, Dhillon, Duc and Chin have not been served. For these reasons, defendants are not in default.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request to file a motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 57), construed as a request for entry of default, is denied.

20120810

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.