Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mohit Randhawa Aka Harpal Singh and Shannon Callnet Pvt Ltd v. Skylux Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- SACRAMENTO DIVISION


August 10, 2012

MOHIT RANDHAWA AKA HARPAL SINGH AND SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. William B. Shubb

Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 2 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 3 Direct Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com 4 Attorneys for Defendants 5 SKYLUX INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, and SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD 6 7

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT [Proposed Order Lodged] Date: No Hearing Set Time: Ctrm: 5

Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa and Shannon Callnet Pvt Ltd. (together, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Skylux Inc., Skylux Telelink Pvt Ltd., and Mujeeb Puzhakkaraillath (together, the "Skylux Defendants") hereby submit the following Stipulation, and for good cause request the Court's approval thereof:

WHEREAS:

1. This action was commenced in state court on May 27, 2009, and was removed to this Court on August 20, 2009.

2. Plaintiffs filed a Fourth Amended Complaint on August 10, 2010. (Docket 2 No. 86).

3. On September 5, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay the entire action pending arbitration between Plaintiff Shannon Callnet and Defendant Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (Docket No. 88.)

4. On September 8 and 9, 2010, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Fourth 7 Amended Complaint. (Docket Nos. 90, 91.)

5. On October 12, 2010, the Court heard oral argument on the motions to 9 dismiss, as well as on Plaintiffs' motion to stay the action. (Docket No. 101.)

6. On October 18, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion to stay the entire action pending completion of arbitration. (Docket No. 102.) As to the 13 claims against the Skylux Defendants, the Court found that the "arbitrable 14 claims against Interactive and non-arbitrable claims against the Skylux 15 defendants sufficiently overlap in law and fact to suggest that the rest of the 16 claims should be stayed." The Court then stated that it "will grant 17 Shannon's Callnet's motion to stay the claims against the Skylux defendants and thus deny the Skylux defendants' motion to dismiss." (Id. at 7:13-27.)

7. On December 9, 2011, the Court ruled: "As it appears that the action will be 20 19 in arbitration for the foreseeable future, this case shall be ordered 21 administratively closed." (Docket No. 123 at 2:18-20.) The Court stayed all proceedings. (Id. at 2:27-28.)

8. On July 12, 2012, Interactive moved to vacate the stay and confirm its 24 23 arbitration award against Plaintiff Shannon Callnet. (Docket No. 124.)

9. On August 3, 2012, the Court ordered the stay be lifted. (Docket No. 131.) 26

The Court further set for a Status Conference for September 4, 2012 "to address the remaining claims against the Skylux defendants."

10. The remaining parties (Plaintiffs and the Skylux Defendants) have submitted 2 a Joint Status Report seeking the Court's clarification of the procedural 3 status of this case.

11. Plaintiffs are willing to extend the deadline for the Skylux Defendants to 5 4 respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint to September 24, 2012, to allow 6 time for the Court to issue the requested clarification.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein, now STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: 9

The time within which Defendants shall respond to the Fourth 10 Amended Complaint shall be extended to September 24, 2012.

ORDER

Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT the deadline for the Skylux Defendants to respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint shall be September 24, 2012. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, declare:

I am employed in the county of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to the within action. My business address is: 135 4 W. Green St., Suite 100, Pasadena, California 91105 (the "firm"). 5

Upon my oath, I hereby state that the foregoing is being filed electronically, and notice hereof will automatically be sent to all counsel of record that participate in electronic filing, by operation of the Court's 9 electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. In addition, if any attorneys are not participating in electronic filing, they are 10 identified below and have been mailed, via first-class postage, notice hereof on the date this document is being electronically filed. 11

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on August 10, 2012, at Pasadena, California. 13 14 15

By: /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport t Gregg A. Rapoport

20120810

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.