Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Title Sandra Weagraff v. El Toro Medical Investors Limited Partnership

August 13, 2012

TITLE SANDRA WEAGRAFF
v.
EL TORO MEDICAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Andrew J. Guilford

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable ANDREW J. GUILFORD

Adrianna Gonzalez Not Present

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE REMAND RE LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

On August 2, 2012, this action was removed to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 and 1446. But removal appears to be improper for the reason(s) opposite the boxes checked:

[ ] Removing party has not alleged when the first defendant to be served was served.

[ ] Removing party has not alleged which defendants have been served and which have not.

[ ] Removing party has not alleged when each served defendant was served.

[] All defendants have not joined in the notice of removal. Generally, all served defendants must join in removal. Chicago, Rock Island, & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 178 U.S. 245, 248, 20 S. Ct. 854, 855, 44 L. Ed. 1055 (1900); Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 669, 703 (9th Cir. 1998); Hewitt v. City of Stanton, 798 F.2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir. 1986); Ely Valley Mines, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 644 F.2d 1310, 1314 (9th Cir. 1981).

[ ] Removal is on the basis of diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 but all plaintiffs are not diverse from all defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332; see also Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806).

[X] A partnership or unincorporated association is joined as a party. For diversity or alienage jurisdiction to be proper, none of the partners or members, including limited partners, can be a citizen of the same state as any opposing party. The citizenship of all the entity's partners must therefore be alleged. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 192-96, 110 S. Ct. 1015, 1019-21, 108 L. Ed. 2d 157 (1990); Rockwell Int'l Credit Corp. v. United States Aircraft Ins. Group, 823 F.2d 302, 304 (9th Cir. 1987).

[ ] Removal is on the basis of diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 but some of the defendants are California ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.