Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Omnivision Technologies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


August 16, 2012

IN RE OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge

This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

WHEREAS, Oakland County Employees' Retirement System, Laborers' District Council Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio, and Woburn Retirement System, ("Lead Plaintiffs") filed an 3 Amended Complaint against Omnivision Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Anson Chan, and 4 Aurelio "Ray" Cisneros, ("Defendants") in Case No. 11-cv-05235 on April 23, 2012; 5 WHEREAS, on June 25, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint; 7

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(a) states that briefs in opposition to a motion "may not 8 exceed 25 pages of text"; 9 WHEREAS, given the complexity and importance of the issues raised by Defendants' 10 motion to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendants do not object to, 7 additional 11 pages to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss; 12 WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(c) states that Defendants' reply brief in support of their 13 motion to dismiss "may not exceed 15 pages of text"; and 14 WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Lead Plaintiffs do not object to, 4 15 additional pages to reply to Lead Plaintiffs' brief in response to the motion to dismiss. 16

NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the Court, that Lead Plaintiffs' brief in 3 response to Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be no longer than 32 pages and Defendants' 4 reply brief thereto shall be no longer than 19 pages. 5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: August 16, 2012 Respectfully submitted, BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE STEPHEN R. BASSER SAMUEL M. WARD /s/ SAMUEL M. WARD SAMUEL M. WARD 600 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 230-0800 Facsimile: (619) 230-1874 DATED: August 16, 2012 BRANSTETTER, STRANCH & JENNINGS, PLLC J. Gerard Stranch, IV James G. Stranch, III /s/ J. GERARD STRANCH, IV J. GERARD STRANCH, IV 227 Second Avenue North, Fourth Floor Nashville, TN 37201-1631 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Facsimile: (615) 250-3937 Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Oakland County Employees' Retirement System, Laborers' District Council Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio, and Woburn Retirement System and the Proposed Class

I, Samuel M. Ward, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest 19 that all signatories have concurred in this filing. 20

/s/ SAMUEL M. WARD SAMUEL M. WARD

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August __, 2012 ¶ˇ

20120816

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.