UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 16, 2012
CARE ALTERNATIVES, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Javier Gonzalez None Present
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER REMANDING MATTER TO STATE COURT
On June 27, 2012, Care Alternatives of California, LLC ("Defendant") insufficiently responded to an Order to Show Cause re Diversity Jurisdiction this Court issued on June 13, 2012. See Docket Nos. 11, 13. As a result, the Court ordered Defendant to file a supplemental brief by July 9, 2012. See Docket No. 15. Given that Defendant did not file that supplemental brief, the Court now determines that Defendant has failed to properly demonstrate the existence of complete diversity, in particular in connection with its obligation -- as the removing party, i.e. the party asserting the existence of this Court's subject matter jurisdiction -- to identify its citizenship in conformity with Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). See also Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001) ("Absent unusual circumstances, a party seeking to invoke diversity jurisdiction should be able to allege affirmatively the actual citizenship of the relevant parties."). As such, the Court now remands the matter to Riverside County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in this Court.
The Court further orders the Court Clerk promptly to serve this order on all parties who have appeared in this action.
Initials of Preparer JG
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.