Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Timothy Bertram v. C. Sizelove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 16, 2012

TIMOTHY BERTRAM,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
C. SIZELOVE, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS Docs. 84, 85, 86, 92

DEADLINE: AUGUST 29, 2012

On July 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for the District Judge to preside over all further proceedings and two motions for sanctions against Defendants for failure to comply with a court order. Docs. 84, 85, 86. On August 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed an amended opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Doc. 89. On August 9, 2012, Defendants filed an amended reply. Doc. 90. On August 15, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for extension time to file responses to Plaintiff's three motions. Doc. 92. In Defendants' motion, counsel states that the documents Plaintiff served on Defendants differ from the documents filed with the Court. Id. Defendants expended considerable time in filing a timely reply to Plaintiff's amended opposition, which prevented them from addressing Plaintiff's three motions. Id. The Court HEREBY GRANTS Defendants' motion for extension time to file responses to Plaintiff's three motions.

Defendants have until August 29, 2012 to file responses to Plaintiff's three motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20120816

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.