Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Frank Wood Boyce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 17, 2012

IN RE: FRANK WOOD BOYCE

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable George H. King, U. S. District Judge

E-Filed/JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Presiding: The Honorable GEORGE H. KING, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Beatrice Herrera N/A N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Dismissing Appeals

On June 20, 2012, we ordered Appellant Frank Wood Boyce ("Appellant") to show ("OSC") cause why the above-captioned appeals should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute because he had not filed his opening briefs despite the fact that they were due on April 5, 2012. On July 30, 2012, we discharged our OSC and granted Appellant leave to file and serve his opening briefs within fourteen days. We warned Appellant that his failure to timely file his opening briefs would be deemed his abandonment of these appeals and, in that event, these appeals would be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute and comply with our Orders.

The docket reflects that Appellant has failed to timely file his opening briefs. Pursuant to our July 30, 2012 Order, Appellant's failure to timely file his opening briefs is hereby DEEMED his abandonment of these appeals. These appeals are hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and comply with our Orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120817

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.