Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Advanced Engineering Solution v. Paccar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


August 20, 2012

ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOLUTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PACCAR, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, AN UNKNOWN ENTITY; KALYPSO, INC., A
CORPORATION; PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION;
ANDREW TIMM, AN INDIVIDUAL; JORDAN REYNOLDS, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO OSC

On July 23, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff Advanced Engineering Solution, Inc. to show 23 cause why the instant case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (the "OSC"). Plaintiff 24 was ordered to file its response to the OSC by August, 13, 2012. Plaintiff has done so.

On August, 13, 2012, Defendant Kalypso emailed the Court to inquire whether the Court 26 had set a deadline by which Defendants could respond to the OSC. This is a prohibited ex parte 27 communication in violation of Local Rule 11-4(c). Nevertheless, the Court hereby orders that any 28

Defendant wishing to file a reply addressing Plaintiff's response to the OSC shall do so by August 2 22, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120820

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.