Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richard Ernest Anaya v. Herrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 20, 2012

RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
HERRINGTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FILINGS ECF Nos.64, 65

Plaintiff Richard Ernest Anaya ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint. ECF No. 64. The Court construed this filing as a Fourth Amended Complaint. This filing has been superseded pursuant to Local Rule 220 by Plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint, lodged April 30, 2012, and filed May 10, 2012. ECF No. 77.

On November 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion regarding discovery. On February 28, 2012, the Court vacated the Discovery and Scheduling Order. ECF No. 67. Thus, Plaintiff's motion for discovery is denied as moot, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120820

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.