IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 21, 2012
LUIS REYNALDO JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
D. CLAYS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
On April 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's screening order filed March 30, 2012, finding that plaintiff's complaint appeared to state a cognizable claim against defendants Baker and Speer for retaliation but failed to state a cognizable claim against defendant Clays for improperly confiscating his television and against defendants Harrington, Knipp, and White for their supervisory conduct and the way in which they handled his inmate appeals. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion fo reconsideration (ECF No. 16) is granted;
2. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 30, 2012, is affirmed.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.