IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 21, 2012
NIKIFOROS P. KALFOUNTZOS, PLAINTIFF,
ARNE DUNCAN; TIMOTHY GEITHNER, DEFENDANTS.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona and in forma pauperis, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 26, 2012, the undersigned granted plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed plaintiff's complaint and petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Dckt. No. 5. The order explained the deficiencies in plaintiff's complaint and petition for writ of mandamus, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id.
The deadline has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 110.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.